Image via Wikipedia

Before you vote on October 6th, understand the real Agenda of the PC’s Liberals NDP and Green Party. The Agenda is to implement UN Agenda 21. Sustainable Development is Agenda 21. Why has no party or candidate told you this? Because if you knew the real Agenda behind Sustainable Development you might be out looking for some rope instead of a pen to mark your ballot.

While it’s good to see Rex shed some badly needed light on the scam that is “global warming”, don’t forget that CBC is up to it’s neck in the constant promotion of the scam.

Peter Mansbridge has done stories about the importance of wind energy to combat global warming which was always a scam.  He’s hosted shows on global warming that were made to scare the public into believing global warming was a real threat and the humans were responsible. In 2008 Mansbridge was made an officer of the Order of Canada -Did he receive the award for doing his part in promoting the scam?

George Stroumboulopoulos the host of CBC’s “The Hour” is not only a big promoter of global warming but he is also on the board of the Suzuki Foundation.

The CBC like it’s cousin the BBC is a cesspit of propaganda pushing Agenda 21 and One World Govt. under the guise of environmentalism.

Note: Both the Conservatives and the NDP planned the same system. Cooked up by Maurice Strong/Al Gore/UN and the World Bank – a continuation of the Enron Scam

According to our Premier, Dalton McGuinty
Ontario Hansard - 19-April2006
“I think the member opposite knows that when it comes to natural gas, prices there tend to be volatile, and it remains a significant contributor to global warming. Wind turbines: We are investing heavily in those, but again, those are an expensive form of electricity and they’re not reliable, because sometimes obviously the wind does not blow. When it comes to solar, those tend to be expensive as well.”

And from the Kingston Health Officer

Wind farm raises health concerns; No long-term effect, says Kingston doctor

Posted By Jennifer Pritchett

Dr. Ian Gemmill, Kingston’s medical officer of health, says there hasn’t been enough monitoring done to determine whether they’re harmful.

Gemmill said, there is nothing to indicate that wind turbines have any long-term effect on people’s health.

“We haven’t got a lot of evidence to go on right now,” said Gemmill. Gemmill said that though there are concerns about low-level noise, appearance and stress caused by the turbines, research has suggested that those effects don’t cause long-term health impacts after people are no longer living near wind farms.

“Our conclusion is that while there may be some short-term concerns, this will not have a long-term health effect,” said Gemmill.

Board member Vicki Schmolka told the board that she wasn’t sure that she agreed with Gemmill’s conclusion. She indicated that she felt there are health concerns associated with the turbines that the board should investigate further.

“Seems to me what we’re really saying is that this person needs to move away and they’ll be OK,” she said.

Schmolka, who is also a city councillor, asked Gemmill if he was comfortable saying that there were definitively no long-term health effects from wind turbines.

“I’m saying it’s reversible,” he responded. “I know that people are bothered by this, but the question here is when do we become involved.”

thewhigJennifer Pritchett

I wish to thank Sherona and her crew for making the trip from Toronto, also Fairchild Television for the original production.

I shot this video On Sept. 11 2009 for Doug Schapira of the Owen Sound Free Press as he took his concerns about the H1N1 Flu virus and vaccine to the doors of the Public Health office in Grey-Bruce-Owen Sound.

To date the Director, Dr. Hazel Lynn, refuses to answer questions raised by the public.

This is the same Health Office that refused to send someone to document health problems reported by people living near wind turbines.

It appears our health officials are more interested in appeasing industry than looking out for the health of citizens.

Hard questions need to be asked of our health officials and we must demand answers to those questions.

Here is a sobering thought to consider as Canada prepares to assume the presidency of the G8 following this week’s meeting in Italy: Canada has for the first time replaced the United States as the worst performer on tackling climate change among G8 nations. This was revealed in the recent G8 Climate Scorecard, released jointly by WWF, the global conservation organization, and the global insurance company Allianz.

The report confirms recent events in North America: There is a new worldview in the U.S. as it rejoins the global community, while Canada continues with the “No, we can’t” approach adopted by successive Canadian governments.

The fact that the U.S. is rapidly leaving Canada in its wake on climate change is particularly important, as Canada’s political leaders have repeatedly claimed that Canada couldn’t afford to move faster or further than our major trading partner.

If that argument ever had merit, it certainly doesn’t now as we see the difference that political leadership can make.

More has been done in the U.S. in the last six months than in the last 30 years. We have seen tough new standards for greenhouse-gas emissions from cars introduced by the Obama administration. There have been massive investments in energy efficiency, green power and public transit. A renewed respect for science, backed by new funding. Climate legislation that would cap emissions from large industrial polluters has been passed by the House of Representatives, and could become law before the international negotiations over a new global deal on climate action in Copenhagen later this year.

As we prepare to participate in the Copenhagen climate summit in December and to play host to next year’s G8 meeting in Huntsville, Ont., we should be taking the longer view and building a legacy of a green economy that will make Canadians proud. The good news is that progress in the U.S. shows how much can change, and how quickly, with a simple change in mindset, from “No we can’t” to “Yes we can.”

Full Story at the Gazette

Part 2

Part 3

Part 4

Carol Mitchell, through her office staff, was invited to attend the taping of a television program at the Ripley wind farm.  She never showed up. Granted the invite was on short notice but there was concern for her when she failed to show.

On the evening of June 22, it was understood  she was scheduled  to attend a Wind Turbine regulations public meeting in Port Elgin where approximately 180 citizens anticipated her arrival .  She did not show up.

I don’t wish to alarm anyone by calling the police  at this time. If you know of her whereabouts please ask her to contact me.

Carol Mitchell may or may not be sporting a small green tattoo.

Your attention in this matter is appreciated!

The above artricle is satire !

How is it that most people now know that global warming is a scam, yet those in the highest office of the Province of Ontario still don’t get it.

Are our elected officials stupid, incompetent, or are they willing participants in the Global Warming/Climate Change Scam?

We know where David Suzuki and Al Gore stand – What about you Dalton and George? Are willing to go down with the ship taking the Province of Ontario with you?

The Scam is coming apart at the seams. Bail out while you can.

Watch the Video!

Toronto, April 27, 2009 -Wind Concerns Ontario is encouraged that the Premier of Ontario has committed to an examination of the health issues involved with industrial wind turbines.

“We’ll take advantage of the very best information that’s out there to make sure that we’re doing something that’s intelligent.”

~Premier Dalton McGuinty The Canadian Press April 24, 2009

The Premier will need to go well beyond speaking only to the manufacturers of these turbines and the Canadian Wind Energy Association lobby in order to rely on the “best information” available. There are and have been better sources of information for several years. Other jurisdictions with far greater experience have implemented stronger regulations that Ontario has so far chosen to ignore. To date the “best” Ontario Health Effects information is the Wind Concerns Ontario survey presented by Dr. Robert McMurtry to the Standing Committee on the Green Energy Act on April 22.

Wind Concerns Ontario repeats its demand that Premier McGuinty apply the precautionary principle and conduct a full epidemiological study into health effects of wind turbines before any more industrial wind projects are installed in Ontario closer than 2km to any residence. This is the only way to avoid causing serious harm to those who live beside industrial wind turbines. Medical authorities elsewhere have already recommended precautionary setbacks.

The Government of Ontario must consider these various national standards:

• Scotland requires setbacks of at least 2 km from cities, towns and villages.
• The United Kingdom’s Noise Association recommends a one-mile (1.6 km) setback.
• France will soon add the International Standards Organization’s absolute level of 25 dBA, as measured inside homes in response to the National Academy of Medicine’s earlier recommendation of 1.5 km. setbacks,
• Germany specifies maximum noise levels for three different environments or “regions”:
  1. quiet 35dBA (Setbacks in quiet or country locations are typically 1000-1500 meters)
  2. middle, 40 dBA
  3. standard, 45 dBA
• Denmark, Holland, and Sweden have a maximum noise level of 40 dBA.
• South Australia’s standard is 35dBA or background +5dB
• New Zealand is now reviewing its secondary noise limit of 35dBA for evening and nighttime in low background

The Canadian Wind Energy Association recommends noise levels of 40-53 dBA. They state that setbacks are normally 300-600 meters but in some cases “separation distances of less than 250 meters may achieve acceptable sound levels” (CanWea paper, “Addressing Concerns with Sound from Wind Turbines,” January 2009).

Ontario’s Ministry of Environment presently does not specify setback distances. It has established only ‘regulatory guidelines’ that allow wind turbines, depending on the wind speed, to produce from 40 to as high as 51 dBA of noise, measured not at property lines but outside homes.

The present standards for Ontario are not nearly the best but rather nearly the worst.

If the Government of Ontario aspires to be a world leader in wind energy, it should also lead the world in protecting its citizens from harmful side effects of this industry. In addition to setting world-class standards for low noise levels on the dBA scale, Ontario must determine appropriate levels on the dBC scale for low frequency sound, reported increasingly as a health concern.